The Cambridge Controversy: A Closer Look at the CCP-Funded Program in Our Schools
On March 8th, 2023, Governor Desantis signed an executive order aimed at safeguarding our education system from the influence of communist countries like China. While this was a commendable step, it may not be enough to combat the insidious efforts of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The executive order primarily focuses on domestic universities, leaving a significant gap that includes universities from non-communist countries such as the UK. One prominent example is Cambridge University, which has become part of our local school district's "Project RISE" program. In this blog post, we will explore why some believe this partnership with Cambridge is problematic and potentially dangerous for the future generations of our country.
The Cambridge Connection
The issue that has raised concerns among many is Cambridge University's source of funding. It's an open secret that Cambridge does not shy away from accepting money from various countries, regardless of their values and ideologies. The danger lies in the old adage, "he who pays the piper calls the tune." When a powerful nation like China financially supports an institution, it's reasonable to expect that they may seek something in return.
The Alarming Reality
What is truly alarming is that our school district appears to be turning a blind eye to these concerns. Despite efforts to bring this issue to the attention of school board members, it has largely been met with silence. It seems they fail to recognize the potential dangers of introducing a program into our schools that may be influenced by external agendas.
The Dangers of Group-Think
One of the primary concerns with the Cambridge program is its curriculum, particularly the "Global Perspectives" component. While it may sound harmless on the surface, a closer look reveals a focus on group-think and questionable values. Lessons that ask whether "everyone has the right to learn" or question the nature of mass participation versus universal participation raise eyebrows. What kind of views are they promoting, and could it be leaning towards communism?
A Better Alternative
As concerned parents and citizens, we should be asking ourselves whether the Cambridge program truly benefits our children's future. Is this the best we can offer them? Is this what they should be learning in school? Instead of focusing on "mass participation," shouldn't we be equipping them with essential life skills such as financial literacy and critical thinking?
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Cambridge program's acceptance of CCP funding and its questionable curriculum have raised valid concerns about its place in our schools. As a concerned community member and a candidate for Superintendent, I pledge to prioritize our children's education and safety. It's time to reevaluate our partnerships and replace programs that may not align with the values and aspirations we hold for our children's future. Our commitment should be to nurture intelligent citizens who can think independently and contribute positively to society.
